Archives before June 13, 2001
Path (my company!)
Most of the Time
American history around the time of the Revolution, figuring out how to marry top-down task-based information architecture processes with bottom-up document-based ones, finding a good dentist in
San Francisco Oakland
the user experience (interaction design, information architecture, user
research, etc.), cognitive science, ice cream, films and film theory,
girls, commuter bicycling, coffee, travel, theoretical physics for laypeople,
single malt scotch, fresh salmon nigiri, hanging out, comics formalism,
applied complexity theory, Krispy Kreme donuts.
to see where I wander.
me you love me by
Track updates of
this page with Spyonit. Clickee
[Editor's note: peterme.com
began as a site of self-published essays, a la Stating
The Obvious. This evolved (or devolved) towards link lists and shorter
thoughtpieces. These essays are getting a tad old, but have some good
Design Recommended Reading List
"My" Is It Anyway?
Information Vs. Application
All contents of peterme.com are © 1998 - 2002 Peter Merholz.
|Where the lungs are as high as an elephant's eye... Posted on 08/12/2001.
My new favorite phrase is "harvesting organs." It's getting an awful lot of play recently. Bush's statements on stem cell research are the most prominent, followed by the debate around human cloning. It gets treated in engaging depth in this week's New Yorker article "As Good As Dead", a lengthy feature on the slippery definition of 'brain death,' and the development of this definition in order to, well, harvest organs from otherwise "live" bodies. Written by Gary Greenberg, perhaps most noted for his epistolary relationship to the Unabomber.
Anyway, whenever I hear the phrase "harvesting organs," I picture farmers in fields, plucking livers, pancreases, etc.
2 comments so far. Add a comment.
Previous entry: "The birth of 'brand image,' and other things."
Next entry: "Heaps o' interaction design links."
is pancreases the plural of pancreas? for whatever reason, i always thought we had a pancrea here, a pancrea there and collectively, they were known as "our pancreas". perhaps the plural should be pancreas'? dunno. i'd much rather focus on the intricacies of the "f word".
this is why i keep reading your site peter! keep up the good work ;)
Posted by evan @ 08/13/2001 10:52 AM PST [link to this comment]
"pancreas" refers to one organ. The plural, especially when referring to "harvesting organs," would be "pancreata."
Posted by erik t @ 02/11/2002 03:01 PM PST [link to this comment]
Add A New Comment: