October 21, 2003

Highlights from HITS Part 2: Experience Economics

IDEO's CEO Tim Brown spoke a bit about experience economics. He showed a lot of shiny pictures from their work on the Prada store, but I was more interested in two frameworks he discussed. The first is a pyramid that comes from the book "The Experience Economy" (I don't know if the 'birthday party' example is from there, too, or was Tim's example).

Experience Triangle

The second interesting idea is that in order for an experience to have an economics, it must fit these three criteria:
- the customer knows they had an experience
- the provider owns that experience
- the customer can tell others about that experience

Later on, in an unrelated panel discussion, ID professor John Heskett mentioned that the key core element that design brings to the business equation is "value creation." Of all the things the businesses desire in their processes, what design can most obviously and directly influence is the creation of "value" to be added to the product or service. I've heard this argument before, usually related to Michael Porter's "value chain."

Posted by peterme at 01:55 PM | Comments (6) | TrackBack

Highlights from HITS Part 1: MBA 101 and Design

[There will be 3 highlights posts]

Last week I attended the inaugural HITS (Humans Interaction Technology Strategy) conference, sponsored by IIT's Institute of Design. An attempt to bridge the worlds of Design and Business, it offered a lot of food for thought. There was no ability for real-time blogging (the conference took place in a remarkably unwired venue), so here are some notes after the fact.

On the first day, we were treated to a couple of cold water presentations, one by Tom MacTavish from Motorola, and another by Jim Euchner from Pitney Bowes. I call them "cold water" because their diehard business perspective was an awakening splash in the face. Also, both utilized the ugliest PowerPoint templates you'll ever seen in a conference sponsored by a design school.

Tom's talk was a no-nonsense look at understanding business and technology[244k PDF], with clues as to how to get the most out of your organization, and how to read financial statements.

Jim's talk was more about the reorganization of teams in order to better encourage product design that succeeds. Jim had two four-circle Venn diagrams that I liked.

The first diagram was of the human elements that go into product design. Ideally, you have them all converge to produce the best work:

Circles connected

("Technologist" can be thought of as the engineer/designer, client is the internal business owner, customer is the person who buys the technology, and user is the person who will use it. Oftentimes in enterprises, the customer and the user are different people.)

He pointed out, though, that the reality is that the rings don't overlap, but get pulled to form a chain...

Circles in a chain

The client and customer serve as intermediaries in a chain between the technologist and the user. Such an arrangement hampers success, as it resembles the child's game "Telephone," where the fidelity of the message degrades as it passes from person to person.

I loved the idea of pulling the rings from that idealized Venn diagram to form a truer representation of how these things really work.

Another diagram of his also had four rings:

Circles and problems

I liked this because it intelligently extends the more typical Venn diagram of feasibility/viability/desirability. It shows that feasibility has two aspects: 1) What we have the technology to build ("Cool ideas") and 2) What the business is geared to address. It's not enough to simply address a "problem worth solving" -- you also must consider whether your organization has the resources to meaningfully address that problem.

One of the things not mentioned in these first two presentations is ROI. Metrics. Finances. So I raised my hands and asked Tom and Jim about how do we consider the ROI of the design component (as we're increasingly asked to do these days) and both pointed out that the various parts of the process are so tightly integrated that awarding elements of the ROI to any particular contributor is nearly impossible. (I don't know if I agree, but I was intrigued that this was the response.)

In all, I was happy to see elemental business questions being addressed so straightforwardly as a way to lead off the day.

Posted by peterme at 01:21 PM | Comments (6) | TrackBack


See Me Travel
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
Archives from June 13, 2001 to January 2003
Archives from before June 13, 2001
Recent Entries
Highlights from HITS Part 2: Experience Economics
Highlights from HITS Part 1: MBA 101 and Design
Subscribe to my feed:
Powered by
Movable Type 3.2